Courtney cox topless on the beach***
I would like to explain the quandary that I, and I'm sure the other people who post here, have been faced with. When reading the comments to my postings, I mostly receive nice compliments. Then there are others. One person thinks there's too much scenery incorporated in the photos, another thinks the scenery is superb. One person wants to see raunchier shots, another thinks a utter frontal shot is unnecessary "porn" (you do realize what the intention of voy-zone is, don't you?). It brings to mind a phrase you may all be familiar with: You can't please everybody all of the time. With that in mind I'm going to proceed to do what I have been doing. Taking and posting shots that I am handy with and that please me; because, after all, I'm the one who is taking a chance criticism by posting nude photos of myself for millions of people to view (at no charge may I remind you). So, gents, keep in mind the fragile self-esteem of mostpeople when you are commenting. And also recall that everyone is someone else's fantasy--just because you don't find a person attractive, doesn't mean nobody else will. If you don't like what you see, there's a magical little thing called a back button on your toolbar. This is particularly intended for you homophobes--there's an M* by the contri title to warn youthat there is a naked maninside. You are obviously not illiterate because you are able to write your ignorant comments. So why exactly do you look ata contri that is so clearly marked as something you wouldn't enjoy? No comments flash basically the same thing as negative comments so be kind or be quiet. Otherwise, post youremail address instead of hiding behind the anonymitythat the contributors give up. Thank you for your kind attention. By the way, the Part II contri was supposed to say "for Joe T." but that part was dropped. So, Joe, consider this one to be for you.